For reasons unknown, a disproportionate amount of the trouble tech people run into is network. I encountered some of these issues recently that forced me to take a close look at the specifics of ONTAP networking. Here are some important details:
ifconfig -a
e0a: flags=0xa508866 mtu 1500
- Make sure the switch ports are hard-coded for LACP if you are creating LACP interface groups (vif's) in ONTAP.
- These are the options for status:
- Up: the link is sending and receiving data.
- Down: the link is down but believed to be operational.
- Broken: the link is inactive and believed to be non-operational.
vif: Cannot create a multi-level 802.3ad compliant vif: vif1
vif: Cannot create a multi-level 802.3ad compliant vif: vif2
vif: vif1 cannot create multi level 802.3ad vif
vif: Failure adding vif1. Continuing with other interfaces
vif: vif2 cannot create multi level 802.3ad vif
vif: Failure adding vif2. Continuing with other interfaces
Here's some more hints:
rdfile /etc/rc#Auto-generated by setup Thu Jul 14 19:22:30 GMT 2011hostname NAMEvif create lacp vif1 -b ip e0a e0bvif create lacp vif2 -b ip e0c e0dvif create lacp supervif1 -b ip vif1 vif2ifconfig supervif1 `hostname`-supervif1 mediatype auto netmask 255.255.255.0route add default 10.18.33.1 1routed onoptions dns.domainname acme.corp.comoptions dns.enable onoptions nis.enable offsavecore
ifconfig -a
e0a: flags=0xa508866
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (auto-100tx-fd-cfg_down) flowcontrol full
trunked vif1
e0b: flags=0xa508866 mtu 1500
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (auto-unknown-cfg_down) flowcontrol full
trunked vif1
e0c: flags=0xa508866 mtu 1500
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (auto-unknown-cfg_down) flowcontrol full
trunked vif2
e0d: flags=0xa508866 mtu 1500
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (auto-unknown-cfg_down) flowcontrol full
trunked vif2
lo: flags=0x1948049 mtu 9188
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask-or-prefix 0xff000000 broadcast 127.0.0.1
vif1: flags=0x22408862 mtu 1500
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (Disabled virtual interface)
vif2: flags=0x22408862 mtu 1500
ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (Disabled virtual interface)
supervif1: flags=0x2354b863 mtu 1500
inet 10.18.33.33 netmask-or-prefix 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.18.33.255
ether 02:a0:98:2c:01:9c (Disabled virtual interface)
Solution: You can't create multi-level multi-mode or LACP vifs. Essentially, if you have two vifs that are load balanced, you can't create a load balanced vif out of those two vifs. This is documented as an unsupported configuration by netapp.
https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=3011251 (requires NetApp login)
So what to do? Simple! Just create one big multi or LACP vif out of the ports you wanted to use in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment